Not everything that belongs to the same place needs to belong to the same story. There are things that cross time without knowing one another, origins that have nothing in common, forms born from different necessities that, when they meet, suddenly seem to recognise one another and speak the same language. Since ancient times, humans have searched for places capable of preserving these coincidences. The ancient cabinets of curiosities brought the world together before it was completely divided into the categories through which we observe it today: what was natural alongside what was artificial, what was known alongside what appeared inexplicable, memory alongside discovery. They were not simply places of collection, but places where things could exist together without having to justify their belonging. Above all, they were a way of looking.
This same necessity gives rise to this space: the desire to bring closer what elsewhere would remain separate; to allow forms, ideas, images, objects, fragments and visions to meet without being traced back to a common origin. What brings them together is not the discipline to which they belong, nor the time from which they come, but the possibility of generating a relationship. When things are taken out of their solitude and placed beside one another, something can happen: their meaning shifts, expands, sometimes gets lost, and at other times finds an unexpected direction. A form can then stop being only what it appears to be and become the beginning of something that does not yet exist.
Forms, after all, are not still. They enter life and are continuously changed by it. They can be inhabited, crossed, transformed; they can adhere to a body, a space, a memory, and in doing so become something else. Matter is not simply what receives a form, but takes part in its transformation. Every thing carries within it a latent possibility, a life that does not necessarily coincide with its origin. Perhaps this is why some forms seem to survive the time that generated them: not because they are preserved intact, but because they continue to find new ways of existing.
What is created, too, once it comes into the world, acquires a presence of its own. It ceases to belong only to the person who created it and begins to establish a relationship with what surrounds it, including the gaze of its creator. It can be observed again, questioned, transformed; it can become a memory of what has been or the beginning of something that does not yet exist. To create means to introduce into matter a possibility that was not there before, but also to accept that this possibility will not remain identical to itself. A truly living form never completely coincides with what one intended to make of it: it retains something excessive, a zone of ambiguity in which it can mean more than one thing, belong to more than one time, speak to more than one gaze. What is created can thus become a counterpart, a memory, a presence, even the origin of a new form.
In this sense, to create also means taking something away from the necessity of already being defined. Every creative act introduces into the world a possibility that was not there before and opens a fracture in the continuity of things. For this reason, it contains a form of resistance: not necessarily against something, but against what claims to be definitive. Resistance to fixedness, to standardisation, to the speed with which everything risks being consumed before it has truly been looked at; resistance to the necessity of the new when the new is nothing more than a different form of repetition. To create means allowing things the time to settle, to contradict themselves, to take on unexpected meanings. It means leaving open the possibility that a form may be more than what it seemed destined to be and that a presence may escape the categories that seek to contain it. Creation thus becomes a practice of freedom: not the affirmation of a fixed identity, but the possibility of multiplying it, changing it, exceeding it.
The past, then, does not need to be recovered. It can be lived again. It can re-emerge in the present without becoming nostalgia, it can be transformed without losing its memory, it can meet what did not belong to it and, precisely through that encounter, produce a new form. Time does not only move forward; sometimes it returns, overlaps, settles onto things and continues to speak through them. What is ancient can become contemporary without ceasing to be ancient, just as what is present always carries with it something that came before. It is in this overlap, in this ambiguity of time, that forms find the possibility of continuing to live.
Beauty is born from this movement. Not as ornament, nor as a criterion through which to establish what deserves to be called beautiful, but as an ability to recognise a relationship where there seemed to be nothing but distance. A restless, unfinished beauty that does not necessarily seek harmony but leaves room for contamination, imperfection, ambiguity and the unexpected. A beauty that is not limited to being contemplated, because it has the ability to change the way we perceive what surrounds us and, through this change in our gaze, to open a different possibility of inhabiting the world. It is here that beauty ceases to be a quality of things and becomes an experience, a form of knowledge, even a form of freedom.
For this reason, choosing also means creating. It means establishing proximities, recognising unexpected affinities, allowing something the possibility of being seen again. Every choice builds a relationship and every relationship changes what takes part in it. The presences that inhabit this space are therefore not arranged according to a hierarchy. Each one is looked at with the same attention and cared for with the same care, not because they are equal, but because each possesses its own possibility of revealing itself. There is no exclusive love for a single form, but a desire to allow many forms to be loved without losing their singularity. In this multiplicity of affection, beauty does not belong to one presence more than another: it manifests itself in the very possibility of recognising in each one a reason to be looked at, encountered and loved again.
©MattiaBarbadoro is born precisely within this space of relationship, between what we come from and what we can still become, between memory and imagination, between forms that already exist and forms that are still waiting to be imagined. It is a place where presences can meet without being exhausted by their origins, where one voice can enter into dialogue with another and become material for something further. Ideas come closer, sensibilities contaminate one another, forms cross through each other and, in their mutual transformation, can give rise to what had not yet found a form. Nothing is collected simply to be preserved: what enters this space remains available to transformation, dialogue and the possibility of generating something else. Time is not ordered, but layered; what has been can become material for what will come, while what takes shape in the present can give new life to what we thought had already come to an end.
The place therefore remains open, not as an archive of what has been, but as a material still in becoming. A space in which forms can continue to live beyond their origins, meet, contaminate one another and generate other forms; in which beauty is not preserved as something already complete, but nourished through the continuous act of creating. Because what is truly alive cannot be reduced to a definitive form: it always carries something that exceeds what we know, a possibility that is still silent, a part that has not yet been spoken.
Perhaps this is the deepest task of a space: not to contain the world, but to offer it the possibility of happening again. To allow what we have received not to end in memory, but to return to us transformed; to allow what exists today to become the beginning of what does not yet exist; to allow every form to find, in its encounter with another, a reason to continue living. Because time is not only what consumes things: it is also what allows them to be born again in another form.
And as long as a form retains the possibility of becoming something else, nothing is truly finished. The world remains open, and with it remains open the possibility of continuing to imagine it.
Access the archive
barbadoromattia@gmail.com
@mattiabarbadoro